In February of 1912 a laborer digging at Barkham Manor near
the village of Pilton found a piece of skull that he reportedly then gave to
Charles Dawson, an amateur archeologist. Charles Dawson then on
approached Sir Arthur Smith Woodword, a very well known geologist and together
they set off to continue digging at the site. They found an ape-like jawbone
with human-like teeth that seemed to link it to the skull Dawson got from the
laborer. It appeared they had found the earliest human.
What’s important to understand is that the British had no
early man. The French and the Germans had many Neanderthals and they were
very proud of their discoveries and the British wanted one of their own,
something to “rival the Germans’ ape man.” They were jealous. The finding
meant fossil evidence for the earliest humans and their primates; a creature
part ape and part human; a fossil that connected humans with apes and
ultimately proof of Darwin’s theory. We know this to be true in todays
day, but back in the early 1900s they did not have the technology, so this had
huge scientific significance in 1912. On December 18, 1912 they presented the
world with “the earliest Englishman” – Piltdown Man. However, some experts
remained skeptical.
They found a tooth matching predictions of the size of the
canine and even found another skull and tooth of Piltdown Man Two. This
find made Pildown genuine – no one could question the initial find now.
They even had the backing of the Natural History Museum, but in 1953 the world
found out that Piltdown Man was a fake. It started with a chemical test to date
the fossils (they were estimating the nitrogen content). They found the
teeth had been filed down. The skull was a different age then the jaw –
even worse the jaw was not even human! The fossils had been boiled and
carefully stained with chemicals to make them look old. The canine tooth seemed
to have been made in a rush because it was crudely filed and colored with paint.
No one knows for sure who did it, but the person who had the
most to gain from the hoax was Charles Dawson. They say his ambitions to make a
name for himself were limitless. This ambition can be portrayed as a
human fault. The need for a sense of pride also played a role because otherwise
maybe the Natural History Museum would have taken more steps to verify the
fossils instead of just accepting it and announcing it to the world. It was
like they just wanted to win the competition, they wanted to be the best. I do
not think that it’s possible to remove the “human” factor from science because
it is humans who are doing the research. How can someone remove something
that is natural to them? After all is not our humanness that makes us human? We
can reduce the chance of errors like this happening again by putting procedures
into place, but I do not suggest removing the human factor from science. Our
humanness is what makes us curious and creative; it leads us to ask questions
and find answers. We need that in science, too. A life lesson that I can
take from this is to remember to be humble and of course, don’t lie because the
truth always comes out.